Voir toutes les langues
Identifiant d'origine
QT36
Libellé préféré
indicateur de qualité
quality indicatorLibellé catégorie
Indicateur de qualitéQuality indicatorNote de contenu Q-Code
élément mesurable pour lequel il existe des preuves ou un consensus qu'il peut être utilisé pour évaluer la qualité des soins fournis. (Woncadic)a measurable element for which there is evidence or consensus that it can be used to assess the quality of care provided. (Woncadic)Contenu conceptuel Q-Code
BENCHMARKING ; a method to measure the quality of health care by comparing - within the same clinical domain - own clinical performance with others, who are recognized as being of a good quality. (Woncadic)GOLD STANDARD ; the optimal structure, procedure, or outcome of the GP's/FP's profes¬sional work. Often used to indicate what peers regard as good professional standard in general practice. As such it acts as the ruler with which a given structure, procedure, or outcome is compared when estimating the QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE (Woncadic)INDICATOR (practice performance) ; a measurable element for which there is evidence or consensus that it can be used to assess the quality of care provided. (Woncadic)Minimal Clinically Important Difference ; A statistically significant minimum set of clinical outcomes that demonstrates a clinical benefit of an intervention or treatment. (MeSH 2017)Quality control/quality assurance: processes for planning, conducting, monitoring, overseeing, and auditing an activity (such as research) to ensure that it meets appropriate standards of quality. (NIEHS gloss)Quality Indicators, Health Care ; Norms, criteria, standards, and other direct qualitative and quantitative measures used in determining the quality of health care.(MeSH)Review of patient records (RPR) ; Review of the collection of documents that provides an account of each episode in which a patient visited or sought treatment and received care or a referral for care from a health care facility. (EURACT 2014)Technical quality of clinical care: The degree to which clinical procedures refl ect current research evidence and/or meet commonly accepted standards for technical content or skill (APHC2004)CUI UMLS
C0525061
Référence bibliographique
Citation
Ferrua M, Sicotte C, Lalloué B, Minvielle E. Comparative Quality Indicators for Hospital Choice: Do General Practitioners Care?. PloS one. 2016; 11(2): e0147296. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26840429
Kringos DS, Boerma WG, Bourgueil Y, Cartier T, Hasvold T, Hutchinson A, Lember M, Oleszczyk M, Pavlic DR, Svab I, Tedeschi P, Wilson A, Windak A, Dedeu T, Wilm S. The European primary care monitor: structure, process and outcome indicators. BMC family practice. 2010; 11: 81. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20979612
Pavlič DR, Sever M, Klemenc-Ketiš Z, Švab I. Process quality indicators in family medicine: results of an international comparison. BMC family practice. 2015; 16: 172. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26631138
Seddon ME, Marshall MN, Campbell SM, Roland MO. Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. Quality in health care : QHC. 2001; 10(3): 152-8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11533422
Spasojevic N, Vasilj I, Hrabac B, Celik D. RURAL - URBAN DIFFERENCES IN HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSESSMENT. Materia socio-medica. 2015; 27(6): 409-11. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937222
Willis TA, Hartley S, Glidewell L, Farrin AJ, Lawton R, McEachan RR, Ingleson E, Heudtlass P, Collinson M, Clamp S, Hunter C, Ward V, Hulme C, Meads D, Bregantini D, Carder P, Foy R, null. Action to Support Practices Implement Research Evidence (ASPIRE): protocol for a cluster-randomised evaluation of adaptable implementation packages targeting 'high impact' clinical practice recommendations in general practice. Implementation science : IS. 2016; 11: 25. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26923369
Lien BabelNet
Lien Dbpedia